What they really meant by "bring the player, not the class"

Posted by admin on 03 4th, 2009

Categories: Featured Articles | no responses

Filed under: Analysis / Opinion , Raiding We here at WoW Insider and others around the WoW community have talked so much about the term “bring the player, not the class” that I’m a little surprised we haven’t started shortening it to “BTPNTC.” But apparently I, at least, have not really understood what Blizzard meant by it when they said it was part of their new philosophy of balancing for raids. Ghostcrawler basically QFT s another forum poster who said the following: “Blizzard has repeatedly stated they didn’t mean any class will be identical to all other classes in effectiveness for your last raid slot. Blizzard has provided a bunch of options you can choose from to get Replenishment, but expects you to choose one of those options. If any choice were a valid choice, there would be no incentive to think about the choice you make. Blizzard wants you to think about your group composition.” As you may have gathered, this is in the contest of ” A plea to remove Replenishment .” What Blizzard, then, apparently means by BTPNTC is that it’s now easier to get your (semi-)required buff and debuff coverage, not that you can do it with any old group. Sort of like threat for tanks, the mini-game of group composition has been made easier, but not made a non-issue. Honestly, I do think Replenishment should be removed – I don’t see how requiring my 10-man raid to bring one of five specific DPS specs, or face the consequences, makes the game more fun. But it’s good to have some insight into the developers’ mindset. What they really meant by “bring the player, not the class” originally appeared on WoW Insider on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink | Email this | Comments

Ultimate Guide Guarantee: "...within seconds of accepting a quest you will
know WHERE to go, HOW to complete it, and WHEN to do it." Click Here For Proof!