Lichborne: The Future of Death Runes in Patch 3.2

Posted by BogaZX on 07 7th, 2009

Categories: Featured Articles | no responses

Ultimate Guide Guarantee: "...within seconds of accepting a quest you will
know WHERE to go, HOW to complete it, and WHEN to do it." Click Here For Proof!

Welcome to Lichborne, the Death Knight class column, with your host, Daniel Whitcomb, who’s still wearing mourning black for AE Unholy Blight. And also because black looks awesome. I admit to being a bit underwhelmed by the Death Knight Q&A . To be fair, this is primarily because most of the things covered were already in the 3.2 patch notes , and the rest was pretty common sense stuff. However, one little comment by Ghostcrawler did catch my attention: His praise of Death Runes. This caught me more than a bit by surprise, since, if anything, the Death Knight changes in Patch 3.2 seem tailor made to discourage the use of Death Runes, at least for Frost and Unholy. Between the damage buff to Blood Strike and diseases, and the nerf to Scourge Strike , we have a pretty good chance of seeing people move away from using Death Runes. The major reason to use Blood Strike in both trees right now is to create Death Runes so you can use higher damage abilities on your next refresh cycle. If Blood Strike becomes the higher damage ability, it’s not worth it to use the Death Runes on something else. There’s a off-chance, I suppose, that you might want the Death Runes handy for an emergency use of Ghoul Frenzy , in theory, but that chance is so slim that no-one’s going to want to waste the talent points in Reaping , at the very least. Continue reading Lichborne: The Future of Death Runes in Patch 3.2 Filed under: Patches , Analysis / Opinion , Talents , (Death Knight) Lichborne Lichborne: The Future of Death Runes in Patch 3.2 originally appeared on WoW.com on Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink